Please take a look at the robustness of the solid infill / gap fill in Release 1.6 vs 1.6.1 and 1.6.2. Note the smaller gaps in the letters in 1.6 vs 1.6.1 and 1.6.2.
Release 1.6 had good solid / gap infill as shown here:
Release_1.6_Good_Solid_Infill_-_Gap_Fill
1.6_Release_Good_Infill-Gap-Fill.JPG (38.89 KiB) Viewed 9963 times
Release 1.6.1 poor solid infill / gap fill
1.6.1_Release_Poor_Infill-Gap-Fill.JPG
1.6.1_Release_Poor_Infill-Gap-Fill.JPG (35.78 KiB) Viewed 9948 times
Release 1.6.2 poor solid infill / gap fill
1.6.2_Release_Poor_Infill-Gap-Fill.JPG (35.78 KiB) Viewed 9948 times
I believe this is a feature that is not shown in the preview, however, the adjustment is made to the g-code when you Save the file. The values you put in to XY and Z are percentages representing part shrinkgage so they will make your g-code larger. If you save the code with and without shrinkage (use a large value like 25% so it's easier to see) you will see the difference in the part either by looking at the g-code or by opening it gcode.ws
Hello mhackney,
It is exactly what I wanted to know.
Thank you very much.
mhackney wrote:I believe this is a feature that is not shown in the preview, however, the adjustment is made to the g-code when you Save the file. The values you put in to XY and Z are percentages representing part shrinkgage so they will make your g-code larger. If you save the code with and without shrinkage (use a large value like 25% so it's easier to see) you will see the difference in the part either by looking at the g-code or by opening it gcode.ws
