Re: KISSlicer 1.6 Beta Bug Reports
Posted: 27 Jul 2017, 21:37
abuharsky, the old problem area looks great now! I'm glad you got it sorted out. I see one of your parts has some strings. Have you tried running the Destring wizard yet?
A forum to talk about KISSlicer
http://www.kisslicertalk.com/
inventabuild wrote:abuharsky, the old problem area looks great now! I'm glad you got it sorted out. I see one of your parts has some strings. Have you tried running the Destring wizard yet?
Yeah, it's not your typical "docking".alil2096 wrote:This isn't a bug, it's a feature. If you want to move the dock, unselect the "Dock Setting Window"
From what I've seen Printer/Hardware/Bed Roughness + Style/LayerThickness = Style/1st Layer Thickness. 1st Layer Thickness and Bed Roughness appear to be two different ways of saying / achieving the same thing.alil2096 wrote:FIRST LAYER HEIGHT
hi, i've always 0.3mm of thickness for the first layer, I've try to change:
-layer thickness
-1st
and the three values on "printer hardware" tab..but the thickness dosen't change, is a bug?
p.s. i have the latest version, beta 1.6 2.4
In the attached profile (thanks for including that!) the inset is 0.15, so for thin walls like you have in the test you are making them 0.3 mm thinner, which is a significant fraction of the extrusion width. I will try to make that more robust, but you can get the expected paths by resetting the inset to 0 if you no longer need it.StrannikZet wrote:Bug?
Does not fill between the walls. Does not print thin walls.
Ok. But what to do with what does not always fill the thin walls? Inset is 0. Thanks!lonesock wrote:In the attached profile (thanks for including that!) the inset is 0.15, so for thin walls like you have in the test you are making them 0.3 mm thinner, which is a significant fraction of the extrusion width. I will try to make that more robust, but you can get the expected paths by resetting the inset to 0 if you no longer need it.StrannikZet wrote:Bug?
Does not fill between the walls. Does not print thin walls.
thanks,
Jonathan