Re: Going with the Flow
Posted: 20 Jan 2018, 23:33
First I want to thank lonesock and the whole collaboration team on producing a really kool product. I really like KISSlicer and want it to be my standard slicer.
I have a HE3D K200 delta printer. I am running he wizzards to calibrate it. I have corrected my extruder E-steps, leveled my bed and also calibrated the extruder temperature for my PLA that I am using.
I tried the Flow calibration and that is where I run in problems. When I print the Flow test using 10 mm^3/s to 1 mm^3/s I get a similar result to what user nuggetz showed in this thread ( viewtopic.php?f=23&t=2066&start=0#p5917 ).
It has an awful gap thru most of it. When I look at the resulting slice in KS, This is what I see: Looks OK. But when loaded inte repetier host, it looks like this: The open areas match the problems areas in the print.
So, can anyone explain why the gcode produces the area that is missing and also why the result in KS does not show it.
Thanks for any insight. If I should open a seperate thread, please let me know.
And again, Thank you for a great slicer.
I have a HE3D K200 delta printer. I am running he wizzards to calibrate it. I have corrected my extruder E-steps, leveled my bed and also calibrated the extruder temperature for my PLA that I am using.
I tried the Flow calibration and that is where I run in problems. When I print the Flow test using 10 mm^3/s to 1 mm^3/s I get a similar result to what user nuggetz showed in this thread ( viewtopic.php?f=23&t=2066&start=0#p5917 ).
It has an awful gap thru most of it. When I look at the resulting slice in KS, This is what I see: Looks OK. But when loaded inte repetier host, it looks like this: The open areas match the problems areas in the print.
So, can anyone explain why the gcode produces the area that is missing and also why the result in KS does not show it.
Thanks for any insight. If I should open a seperate thread, please let me know.
And again, Thank you for a great slicer.