Hello,
I am using the new release of KISSlicer 1.6, and have problem when I try to slice a part which is higher than the others.
When I click on Slice, the soft start and stop straight after. If I try to visualize the layer I can't move the Z value and it just shows me one layer.
Its look like its something with the heigh, because if I flip the part I have no problem...
someone knows what's going on ?
Thanks
Romain
Problem when slicing
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: 23 Sep 2017, 16:18
Re: Problem when slicing
Hi guys, still have problem and I dont find the solution. The part was correctly slice with an other slicer and I try with Kiss on an other computer and he do the same.
When I moved the path% bar, we can see only one layer...
When I moved the path% bar, we can see only one layer...
- Attachments
-
- B.png (84.63 KiB) Viewed 2048 times
-
- A.png (85.68 KiB) Viewed 2048 times
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: 23 Sep 2017, 16:18
Re: Problem when slicing
Hi guys,
I solved the problem, I had put a Z step(mm) of 80 in the printer profile... So back to 0 and it works well. Do not know what I'm supposed to put in.
I solved the problem, I had put a Z step(mm) of 80 in the printer profile... So back to 0 and it works well. Do not know what I'm supposed to put in.
- lonesock
- Posts: 258
- Joined: 09 Nov 2014, 18:41
- Contact:
Re: Problem when slicing
For a delta you don't really need to enter that value, it's primarily for us Cartesian owners. (It is still useful when adaptive layers are selected for multiple objects, so you don't get layers whose Z is some fraction of a micron higher than the previous layer.)
thanks,
Jonathan
thanks,
Jonathan
-
- Posts: 149
- Joined: 20 Aug 2016, 18:25
Re: Problem when slicing
You mean 0.0125 or did you really put 80 there and I don't understand what it should actually be? In short, is this step resolution or steps per mm?Khayrisill wrote:Z step(mm) of 80
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: 23 Sep 2017, 16:18
Re: Problem when slicing
Thanks Jonathan.lonesock wrote:For a delta you don't really need to enter that value, it's primarily for us Cartesian owners. (It is still useful when adaptive layers are selected for multiple objects, so you don't get layers whose Z is some fraction of a micron higher than the previous layer.)
thanks,
Jonathan
hacker wrote:You mean 0.0125 or did you really put 80 there and I don't understand what it should actually be? In short, is this step resolution or steps per mm?
No really 80, it is my mistake I have confused parameters from the EEPROM
-
- Posts: 149
- Joined: 20 Aug 2016, 18:25
Re: Problem when slicing
Ah, you mean you changed it from 80 and it's got better. I should've paid attention to the wording, thanks.Khayrisill wrote:hacker wrote:You mean 0.0125 or did you really put 80 there and I don't understand what it should actually be? In short, is this step resolution or steps per mm?
No really 80, it is my mistake I have confused parameters from the EEPROM